Greg_Groogan's Blog

For me, the more Hillary attacks Obama, the better and better Obama looks for me, and the more I'm glad I voted for him in the primary.

I'm wondering how the country got stuck with these two as potential presidential candidates with all the capable people living in the United States? Are we sure the voting process was legitimate? After reading the dealings both of these people have been involved in they should be in jail, not trying to be president! I still go by the old saying from my childhood. "The guilty dog barks first".

I said it before that Hillary wants power and Obama wants the world!

Scottythecomic - He can't be blamed for what someone else has said. It's just that simple. It would be far different of he had MADE these comments but he didn't.

Redtractortom - Who in this world does not have a personal agenda? Not that I am agreeing with you that Clinton wants power and Obama wants the world. But I'm lost on the "guilty dog barks first." None of them are guilty of anything other than trying thier very best to win.

Scottythecomic - I understand where you're coming from. But look at it from this angle, if you would.

Have you ever heard of or personally known anyone who grew up in a family that was not tolerant of other races? And that person matured into a better person than his/her parents? They grew up to love everyone as equals? Without consideration of skin tone at all?

If so, then you can perhaps see where going to a church where some people may be racist would should not brand everyone a racist. Even if someone visited that church for an extended period of time.

Now don't get me wrong. I do know the reverse is possible. Going to a church where racism is preached CAN have an advese affect on someone who was not racist at first. I am not blind to that possibility. All I'm saying is that we can't assume the worst when the best may be standing in front of us.

What do you think?

Foehammer, my old saying comes from the premise the person who denies it first is the one who is guilty. With Hillary it's the same as Bill, when her mouth moves she is lying. Nothing that has come from her campaign without first going through her so she knows. Now she acts as though she is innocent. "NOT". Just as Obama thinks he can change the way things are run in Congress. "NOT"! Unless he uses some different means and those means may not be anything America wants!