MyFox
 

BARK's Yelps

by BARK from University of Houston

Last Post 72 days, 10 hours Ago


A guy in Iran came over to the US and did an interview with CNN. He said he was sorry for the 1979 thing. He said he neither endorsed nor encouraged US flag burning. He said Iran could be democratic and Islamic. And he said he viewed the US as a model for democracy.

 

A guy in America said a friendly Iran would provide balance in the region. This guy went to the big speaking engagements the guy in Iran gave. He said Iran may be justified for feeling anger.

Then a woman here in the US said: she regretted 1953 and the support we gave Saddam. She lifted sanctions on carpets and pistachios.

 

It was Khatami, Clinton, and Albright respectively.

 

They were willing to work together, but the pressure from both populations came to be too much. Both populations at this time now are full of young people who want to see change, but there are more old people who harbour old anger. The old people bested the young people and we now hate each other. (The two nations, not old and young people.)

 

An ultra conservative replaced Khatami.

 

An ultra conservative replaced Clinton.

 

Now we are about to war. Is it worth it old people? Is being right about another nation you know next to nothing about worth a war? Are you going to pawn this debt off on us as well old people? We are about to take over this nation and you want to give us debt up to our eyes, and a world who hates us?

 

YOU BETTER BE READY!!! We are better than we have ever been before. Understand that when you pass the reigns to us we will halt your course and change it drastically. We will write of the xenophobia and blatant racism and religious persecution ya’ll have felt comfortable with very disdainfully.

 

George W. Bush. I respect you as a man, but my generation will not allow you to go unquestioned. You slid in before we had a chance to fight, but we are here now. You are this generations Richard M. Nixon.

 

Like it or not, our generation will be the first to befriend nations you and our predecessors have hated since William Knox D’Arcy.

 

We are informed, motivated, and have nothing else left to lose; ya’ll made sure of that.       

7 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 7
Page 1 of 1
BayouVixen read my blog view my photos
May 17, 2008 | 6:11 PM

Clinton was replaced by an ultra-conservative? Who, pray tell?
Bush is not an ultra-conservative by any stretch of the imagination, young whipper-snapper. He's a neo-con, a globalist and a fascist, but I most certainly would not sully the name of "conservative" by including his in the roll call.
That said, good luck kid: my generation said the same thing when we were your age.

tre_tigger read my blog view my photos
May 19, 2008 | 9:18 AM

What a disillusioned young person. You do not understand that You will die when You reach out Your hand to people who believe there will be peace when all that oppose them are destroyed.Your words show that Your heart may be in the right place and I admire that but our problem lyes both with islam and our own government.If the federalists had not occupied our land for so long it would be a different story.There is so much to do that You should look a little closer at who Your allegiance is to. I do understand that growing a pattern of thought that portrays real freedom is a difficult process in a day when revisionist history and communist rederick has been shoved down the throat of the American People.See my post on the political blog. I am going to write it now.

BARK read my blog view my photos
May 19, 2008 | 2:26 PM

Hey Bayou Vixen,
I appreciate your comments and understand what you are saying. I have already posted a thing about neo cons and conservatives.

Political dialogue is so garbled by rhetoric today that speaking clearly is almost impossible. Our words are near meaningless today.

I suppose in this context I mean ultra realist more properly.

BayouVixen read my blog view my photos
May 19, 2008 | 6:18 PM

I don't think it's terminology which makes our words near-meaningless, Bark. It's our spoiled, set-in-comfort society. Most Americans are simply too complacent to care about what is really going on in this world -- and if they DO care, they're afraid to take action.

BARK read my blog view my photos
May 20, 2008 | 3:11 PM

This is true, but also think of a word like Patriot. Screw asking people what a patriot is, ask them who some were. Lacking knowledge of what a patriot really is is via lacking understanding of the word.

Now politicians and spin doctors get a hold of it and the word means nothing what it did before, however it still has the same emotive weight.

To continue with patriot. I forget but I think it was Adams in this instance. Someone asked him why a policy must be enacted if it was going to bring hard times. He said that it offered a brighter future. The guy replied back that they will be dead by then. This struck our founding father as one of the most unpatriotic things ever.

To say to hell with the future is to damn our own nation. Policies which show brutish resolution at the expense of future relations is, by the standards the idea 'patriotism' enveloped at our founding, unpatriotic.

Now, how does the word itself jive with the modern application as we have today?

Defense department.
Foreign services.
Iraqi Freedom.

Our most sucessful and influential people today are whom?

What did Orwell say was being removed for the newest Ingsoc dictionary?

Verbs. Why? An idea is just an idea until it is put into practice. With no verbs to practice the idea then the aplication to the real world dies. The idea only lives in the minds of a few.

If we remove the practices that ensure liberty ie. privacy then PR can redefine it.

It is liberty as long as you are doing right. Isn't that what they say. So what if they tap your phones if you got nothing to hide

BARK read my blog view my photos
May 20, 2008 | 3:52 PM

But I suppose this digression is my fault. Really I was speaking about Iran.

BARK read my blog view my photos
May 20, 2008 | 3:57 PM

I have written this before, but it was a lot longer. Shortening this down sucks some sap out. What it really forms out to be is that the old ideas of xenophobia are dying out. alot due to the internet. The young people in Iran made a move that was anti-xenophobic. If that is fair to use as a word here. The young people voted for reform.

Young people here are voting for reform as we speak.

Now did the greatest generation change the world...

Yes.

It did.

Bayou, you said, "That said, good luck kid: my generation said the same thing when we were your age."

And you did. Black people can vote. Women are free to become sex objects or presidents. You shook the consciousness of this nation and changed the rules, laws, and morals. What more were you hoping for?

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




BARK

I majored in Political Science and Religion. The rest is "not-for-net"

Member Since: 5/12/2008