MyFox
 

BARK's Yelps

by BARK from University of Houston

Last Post 44 days, 6 hours Ago


Ok right and wrong doesn't matter right now. I am not supporting the war, and I am not opposing the war. I am not a liberal, I am not a Conservative. I am a republican, and I am a Democrat. I support gay rights cause gay people want them, and I support no gay right cause moral people don't want them. I am everything, I am nothing, I speak as an american first last and only.

Strictly from a cost benefit analysis I want to view this war.

The simple truth is that the weapons we found were not what we were asserting at all. As an analogy it would be like a police officer getting a warrant to search a house for a weapons stockpile and finding a single .22 revolver. al Qaeda never had bases until we created a situation in which they could thrive. As long as these gangs of thugs have shadows and instability they will be ok, but before life in Iraq wasn't this bad. What got you in trouble was talking bad about Saddam. And yes sometimes it would look like a scene from 1984, but it was not this bad.

Yes the Kurds were gettting shat on, but what about Darfur? What about China.

I think the taxpayers could have gotten more utility from their tax dollars by doing things here. The emotion we felt after the attacks was justified and worth responding to. But that fight is in Afghanistan. We got swept up in the moment and attacked a country that we have had issues with for a long time. I don't think it was the right time. Maybe we could have gotten Iraq in a few years, or maybe we should have gotten them before, but now those options are off the table.

Shock and awe disabled the electricity and water, which I believe we all can agree are very necessary for sanitation. We simply have not turned them back on. That is reprehensible for a civil nation to do. I feel shame that we asked them to believe in our mission, we asked them to rise and fight with us, we asked them to turn over terrorists, but we denied them an election when they asked for it (2003), and we deny them still basic neccessities. We could easily get them back on line. This is AMERICA! We can do at least that for them.

Now the people there suffer, and some fight. And it costs us alot. Personally I say FORGET IRAQ! Lets give some money to lenders to help their business out, lets try to help some homeowners get back home.

Lets work on cancer research and new technology. Lets solve issues about poverty by giving grants to universities to study the problem. Lets cut back unneccessary programs and use the money to help ourselves. We earned it. We paid taxes. Why are WE as taxpayers paying to destroy and rebuild a nation for people who do not want us there. If they did want us there they would not kill us. And if those in power wanted us there, they would not ignore our benchmarks and disrespect our requests.

This war will end up costing alot. The exact number I don't care about, I think the term ALOT, should suffice.

It cost us money.

It cost our morals.

Whatever you agree with, we made conventions saying when we fight wars we are good enough that we don't need to cheat. We signed that. And even that is not the issue. Take up all the legal arguments you want. But we agreed as a man would agree, not to do things like this (Geneva Conventions). If nothing else we broke our word. You should not lawyer the hell our of your word. A combatant is a combatant. POW thats what they are. We all know we are in a war. That is a duhh. We call it the Iraq war, not the Iraq situation or anything else. We backed down from our word.

It cost our constitution.

The expansion of executive power is the most unconservative thing I have heard in a long time. Putting more power into the office of ONE man, at the federal, not the state level is antithetic to the ideas. We have implied that war power are the executives when strictly speaking this is wrong. That power goes to congress. That is constitution 101. Unless you consider even the few thousand people here illegally an invasion, we have no right to suspend habeas corpus. Only in rebellion or invasion. I think the term is insurrection.

This is too much to bear. I am PROUD to be an American because we are BETTER than most of the rest. Our ideas of liberty are far superior to anyone's tyranny. Our belief that our systems are strong enough as are, to deal with some crazy whacked out Muslims should prevail. Unless we have no faith in our justice system we should let them speak. If they are a terrorist we should kill them. But they should have to stand before our courts and AMERICAN CITIZENS ie. a jury, and tell me why they want to destroy my country. That is a big part of the legal system. It is not just about the prosecutor and defendant. It is about open trials where people answer for the things they cause here. I want those in GITMO to answer to me. And as long as they keep them behind a curtain where I can't see them, they are denying my AMERICAN RIGHT to see justice being adminstered to those who need a little american law in their world.
10 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 10
Page 1 of 1
joeydotcom view my photos
May 13, 2008 | 8:37 AM

As long as our ideas of liberty are just ideas, we're going to have a hard time maintaining the illusion of democracy. I like the way you pretend to sit on a fence at the beginning, then start slamming every other nation and wave a flag and scream "jesus saves" at the end. Good show, its that homemade, warm, fresh-from-the-oven disingenuous American moxie that makes me too embarrassed to travel.

FYInfo read my blog view my photos
May 13, 2008 | 3:00 PM

When this mad man of a president decides he wants another war with another Country what will hte outcome be.
He is the Commander in chief of our forces and will the forces obey him or Congress?????????
I think we had a coup with 9/11 which prompted his White House Executive Powers.

BARK read my blog view my photos
May 13, 2008 | 4:20 PM

Joey,
Liberty and democracy are two ideas that are antithetic to eachother. This is true. However, people better than me thought it could work. They left its maintenence up to people like us. If this nation fails it will not be the fault of the politicians or business. Had any of us actually learned about our forefathers we would be proud. If this nation fails it will be the fault of apathetic, cynical, people who will rarely put their back where their blog is.

A lady: "What have you wrought?"
Thomas Jefferson: "A Republic, if you can keep it."

BARK read my blog view my photos
May 13, 2008 | 4:36 PM

FY,
Truthfully we can not fight anyother wars right now. We are overburdened, taxed, and tired. Prolonged warfare (see Sun Tzu).

He is the Commander in Chief of the Military. The Military will obey him. They will then obey the next president.

The expansion of executive powers is a long running program. Even President Bill Clinton sought to expand Executive Powers. There was no coup, this is all a result of Americas' lackluster involvement in politics. When people ignore politicians, politicians do these things.

The only time WE as people notice is when a scandal breaks. That is the only time we care. Then when it does hit we say, "Gee, I never saw that coming?!?" Go figure.

There was no coup, this was the opportunity these systems we made for. 9/11 was a chance to test our American systems.

We had a chance to see if we are the best because of the institutions and processes we created work.

Instead we got scared and changed the rules like a pathetic five year old who is losing in monopoly and tells his little sister all the one dollar bills are now five hundred dollar bills, and all the five hundreds are ones.

I was proud, am proud, of seperation of powers, checks and balances...

It is not the president. He did what all the founders warned us that he would do. WE failed as PEOPLE to stop him from undermining these processes.

Rixfoto
May 13, 2008 | 10:03 PM

Where is William of Ockham when we need him? "Ockham's Razor" postulates that the least complicated solution to any problem is the usually the best solution.

Our nations founding fathers left us a simple guide book for governance, the Constitution of the United States of America. The pocket sized copy I carry, printed by the Cato Institute, includes a preface, the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and all amendments and still only contains 58 pages and approximately 7400 words.

Contrast this with the average state constitution which runs 36,000 words and will contain hundreds of amendments. Texas' sixth constitution, that of 1876 has been amended 432 times.

The problem, as Bark has so aptly pointed out, is not that we lack a system of governance. The problem is that we, the people, have allowed our elected leaders to pervert both the spirit and the letter of our founding document.

Our elected officials, our appointed judges and salaried bureaucrats are all human beings, subject to very human failings. When some of them succumb to the evils of greed for personal gain and the lust for power they are acting within predictable boundaries of the human condition. We cannot collectively call out, as did Captain Reynaud in the movie Casablanca while coming from the roulette room , winnings in hand, "I'm shocked, shocked, there's gambling going on in there."

We have allowed government, at all levels, to play fast and loose with the rules for decades. This has had a cumulative effect on the erosion of our basic constitutional rights and now

Wonderful-World read my blog view my photos
May 14, 2008 | 11:35 AM

Very well said, Bark and Rix. So the question remains - what do we do about it?

tre_tigger read my blog view my photos
May 15, 2008 | 8:29 AM

Sirs,there is but one answer and if You've been around very long You know what it is and that it is on it's way.Damn the talking and damn the men who are treacherous enough to sell out their soveirn nation.I have a piece of advice that is worth it's weight and it is,food,water and ammo.The problem is as stated so precisely by Rixfoto, WE have let them do this and We should be the ones who either die on the battle field or take it back. I guess we could be as some and let our children do it but that is the definition of a coward.My Grandfather was a volunteer submarine Man in WW2 and although F.D.R. brought us into the war with treachery and deciet they still did what they had to do.Oh soveirn God[Jehova]Yaweh I humble myself before You and commit to You that I will not lay down My arms and I will defend the Honor of My state first and My country.I will continue to offer salvation through the Lord Jesus the Christ to any one who will listen but I will not allow the right of this nation to be free, to be infringed upon.Not my will oh God but Yours.Revivalution is better than just revolution.

BARK read my blog view my photos
May 15, 2008 | 4:39 PM

This nation is a very delicate experiment. The words, “We the people” were hotly debated. An argument was that the declaration should begin with “We the states.”

Power has always been balanced between the church and state. This nation was the first time thinkers ever got a chance to try to balance the powers between citizens and state. Tis a delicate balance, easily disturbed. Both sides work to check each other. Machiavelli said people are susceptible to fads, but their collective morals would prevail, thus their power.

Our powers to be today have taken a back seat to Mercedes, Playstation, and Louis Vutton. We are distracted, and I can’t help but wonder, did they distract us so they COULD get power? Or did their power come AFTER we got distracted?

BARK read my blog view my photos
May 15, 2008 | 4:41 PM

"Very well said, Bark and Rix. So the question remains - what do we do about it?"

Be ready. A peaceful revolution is on the way. One that Jefferson himslef would have participated in. We have rules to follow and guidlines to play by, but there are numbers of young people who are ready to do what the hippies did even better, and more professionaly.

BARK read my blog view my photos
May 15, 2008 | 5:00 PM

This is for Tre Tigger:

Remember what Jesus said

Matthew 5:17: Think not that I am come to destroy the law

46: For if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye? do not even the publicans the same?
47: And if ye salute your brethren only, what do ye more than others? do not even the publicans so?
(Matt ch. 5)

Pay more than lip service. But do it smartly.

Remember Judas was always wanting more political power. Jesus would never help him get it. So if God does not answer your prayers for a violent overthrow sir, then understand he hates violence.

Besides that you have mechanisms built into your constitution to handle this. All you have to do is take it to the streets. It sounds like it is slow, and it is, but as you said “I guess we could be as some and let our children do it but that is the definition of a coward”

The constitution mentions "treason, rebellion, and insurection" several times. That is because we are supposed to be civil and we can do it without guns. Our founders made elections and impeachments to assure you can overthrow your government periodically. Don’t use violence and stunt your cause.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




BARK

I majored in Political Science and Religion. The rest is "not-for-net"

Member Since: 5/12/2008