Thoughts of HoMan

1.      $11 Billion to $22 billion is spent on welfare to illegal
aliens each year by state governments.

Verify at: http://tinyurl.com/zob77



2.      $2.2 Billion dollars a year is spent on food assistance
programs such as food stamps, WIC, and free school lunches for illegal
aliens.

Verify at: http://www.cis..org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.html



3.      $2.5 Billion dollars a year is spent on Medicaid for illegal
aliens.
                             Verify at:
http://www.cis..org/articles/2004/fis calexec.html



4.     $12 Billion dollars a year is spent on primary and secondary
school education for child ren here illegally and they cannot speak a
word of English!
                             Verify at:  
http://transcripts.CNN.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt
.0.HTML



 5.      $17 Billion dollars a year is spent for education for the  
American-born children of illegal aliens, known as anchor babies.
                             Verify at
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt
.01.h tml



6.  $3 Million Dollars a DAY is spent to incarcerate illegal aliens.
                             Verify at:
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt
.01.html



7.  30% percent of all Federal Prison inmates are illegal aliens.
                             Verify at:
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt
.01.html



 8.  $90 Billion Dollars a year is spent on illegal aliens for Welfare
& social services by the American taxpayers.

Verify at: http://premiumcnn.com/TRANSCIPTS/0610/29/ldt.01.htmla>



9.  $200 Billion Dollars a year in suppressed American wages are caused
by the illegal aliens.

Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.
html



10.  The illegal aliens in the United States have a crime rate that's
two and a half times that of white non-illegal aliens.  In particular,
 their children, are going to make a huge additional cri me problem in
the US
                             Verify at:
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0606/12/ldt
.01.html



11.  During the year of 2005 there were 4 to 10 MILLION illegal aliens
that crossed our Southern Border also, as many as 19,500 illegal aliens
from Terrorist Countries.  Millions of pounds of drugs, cocaine, meth,
heroin and marijuana, crossed into the U. S from the Southern border.

                             Verify at: Homeland Security Report:  
http://tinyurl.com/t9sht



12.  The National Policy Institute, 'estimated that the total cost of
mass deportation would be between $206 and $230 billion or an average
cost of  between $41 and $46 billion annually over a five year period.'
                             Verify at:  
http://www.nationalpolicyinstitute.org/pdf/deporta
tion.pdf



13.  In 2006 illegal aliens sent home $45 BILLION in remittances back
to their countries of origin.
                             Verify at:
http://www.rense.com/general75/niht.htm



14.  'The Dark Side of Illegal Immigration: Nearly One Million Sex
Crimes Committed by Illegal Immigrants In The United States .'
                             Verify at:
http://www.drdsk.com/articleshtml



The total cost is a whopping $ 338.3 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR.

Quote of the Day........'My friends, we live in the greatest nation in
the history of the world.  I hope you'll join with me as we try to
change it.' -- Barack Obama (change it?)

From the Editorial Page of the Richmond Times-Dispatch July 7, 2008.

Each year I get to celebrate Independence Day twice. On June 30, I celebrate my independence day and on July 4, I celebrate America's. This year is special because it marks the 40th anniversary of my independence.

On June 30, 1968, I escaped Communist Cuba, and a few months later I was in the United States to stay. That I happened to arrive in Richmond on Thanksgiving Day is just part of the story, but I digress.

I've thought a lot about the anniversary this year. The election-year rhetoric has made me think a lot about my native Cuba and what transpired there. In the late 1950's, most Cubans thought Cuba needed a change, and they were right. So when a young leader came along talking about change, every Cuban was at least very receptive.

When the young leader spoke eloquently and passionately and denounced the old system, the press in Cuba and even the USA fell in love with him. They never questioned who his friends were or what he really believed in. When he said he would help the farmers and the poor and bring free medical care and education to all, everyone believed. When he said he would bring justice and equality to all, everyone said 'Praise the Lord' finally. And when the young charismatic leader said, 'I will be for change and I will be the arbiter of that change, everyone yelled, 'Viva Fidel!'

But everyone was so excited about the change, nobody bothered to ask about the details of the change. Well, by the time the executioner's guns fell silent and the people's own guns had been taken away. By the time everyone was equal, they were equally poor, hungry, and oppressed. By the time everyone received their free education it was worth nothing. By the time the press noticed, it was too late, because they were now working for him. By the time the change was finally implemented Cuba had been knocked down a couple of notches to Third-World status. By the time the change was done way more than a million people had taken to boats, rafts, and inner tubes, risking sharks or drowning to escape the change. You can call those who made it ashore with us to Florida or anywhere else in the world, the most fortunate Cubans. And now I am getting a very familiar feeling that goes back to the beginning of my story.

But, we would never fall for that in America. We wouldn't put a young leader in charge of this great country who promised change without asking:

What change?

How will you carry it out?

What will it cost America?

I bought a bird feeder. I hung it on my back porch and filled it with seed. What a beauty of a bird feeder it is, as I filled it lovingly with seed. Within a week we had hundreds of birds taking advantage of the continuous flow of free and easily accessible food. But then the birds started building nests in the boards of the patio, above the table, and next to the barbecue.

Then came the poop. It was everywhere: on the patio tile, the chairs, the table ... everywhere! Then some of the birds turned mean. They would dive bomb me and try to peck me even though I had fed them out of my own pocket. And others birds were boisterous and loud. They sat on the feeder and squawked and screamed at all hours of the day and night and demanded that I fill it when it got low on food. After a while, I couldn't even sit on my own back porch anymore.

So I took down the bird feeder and in three days the birds were gone. I cleaned up their mess and took down the many nests they had built all over the patio. Soon, the back yard was like it used to be.... quiet, serene and no one demanding their rights to a free meal.

Now let's see. Our government gives out free food, subsidized housing, free medical care, and free education and allows anyone born here to be an automatic citizen. Then the illegals came by the tens of thousands. Suddenly our taxes went up to pay for free services; small apartments are housing 5 families; you have to wait 6 hours to be seen by an emergency room doctor; our child's 2nd grade class is behind other schools because over half the class doesn't speak English. Corn Flakes now come in a bilingual box; I have to "press one" to hear my bank talk to me in English, and people waving flags other than "Old Glory" are squawking and screaming in the streets, demanding more rights and free liberties. Just my opinion, but maybe it's time for the government to take down the bird feeder.

If, by law, to become a United States citizen one must have some grasp on the english language.  By no means does this mean one must be a scholar.  Why is it then that we have election ballots in other languages?  Just a thought...

Ok,  I know the Obama camp has already wiped the speech off the face of the web, but did anyone else catch the ridiculous"solution" to America's gas problem.  The United State's "savior" has this as his energy plan...

 

 

 

Even he says it like he does not believe it...He is so out of touch with the American people it is sick....What do you, the faithful blogger nation feel about this energy plan?

On Becoming Illegal.

FORMS ARE GOING FAST- SIGN UP TODAY!
 
Becoming Illegal (Actual letter from an Iowa resident and sent to his senator)
 
The Honorable Tom Harkin
731 Hart Senate Office Building
Phone (202) 224 3254
Washington DC, 20510
 
Dear Senator Harkin,
 
As a native Iowan and excellent customer of the Internal Revenue Service, I am writing to ask for your assistance. I have contacted the Department of Homeland Security in an effort to determine the process for becoming an illegal alien and they referred me to you.
 
My primary reason for wishing to change my status from U.S. Citizen to illegal alien stems from the bill which was recently passed by the Senate and for which you voted. If my understanding of this bill's provisions is accurate, as an illegal alien who has been in the United States for five years, all I need to do to become a citizen is to pay a $2,000 fine and income taxes for three of the last five years. I know a good deal when I see one and I am anxious to get the process started before everyone figures it out.
 
Simply put, those of us who have been here legally have had to pay taxes every year so I'm excited about the prospect of avoiding two years of taxes in return for paying a $2,000 fine. Is there any way that I can apply to be illegal retroactively? This would yield an excellent result for me and my family because we paid heavy taxes in 2004 and 2005.
 
Additionally, as an illegal alien I could begin using the local emergency room as my primary health care provider. Once I have stopped paying premiums for medical insurance, my accountant figures I could save almost $10,000 a year.
 
Another benefit in gaining illegal status would be that my daughter would receive preferential treatment relative to her law school applications, as well as 'in-state' tuition rates for many colleges throughout the United States for my son.
 
Lastly, I understand that illegal status would relieve me of the burden of renewing my driver's license and making those burdensome car insurance premiums. This is very important to me given that I still have college age children driving my car.
 
If you would provide me with an outline of the process to become illegal (retroactively if possible) and copies of the necessary forms, I would be most appreciative. Thank you for your assistance.
 
Your Loyal Constituent,
Donald Ruppert
Burlington , IA
 
Get your Forms (NOW)!! Call your Internal Revenue Service 1-800-289-1040. 
 

Apparently the Obamas of Kenya have been reading those scurrilous emails to which Barack likes to refer, because they have no doubt -- contrary to the claims of the Obama campaign, that the presidential candidate was raised a Moslem. They take that as a given.

As the Jerusalem Post reports, "Barack Obama's half brother Malik said Thursday that if elected his brother will be a good president for the Jewish people, despite his Muslim background. In an interview with Army Radio he expressed a special salutation from the Obamas of Kenya."

The Obama brothers' father, a senior economist for the Kenyan government who studied at Harvard University, died in car crash in 1982. He left six sons and a daughter. All of his children - except Malik -- live in Britain or the United States. Malik and Barack met in 1985 in the US.

"He was best man at my wedding and I was best man at his," said Malik in a 2004 interview with an AP reporter. Their paternal grandfather, Onyango Hussein Obama, was one of the first Muslim converts in Nyangoma-Kogelo, Malik said."

In a remarkable denial issued last November that still stands on the official campaign website, Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs issued a statement explaining that "Senator Obama has never been a Muslim, was not raised as a Muslim, and is a committed Christian."

Apparently Malik Obama, himself a Muslim, had not read the press release.

Melanie Phillips is the most recent commentator to draw attention to the massive body of evidence that leaves no doubt that Barak Hussein Obama was born a Muslim (Islam is patrilineal) and raised a Muslim (so registered in school, acknowledging attending Islamic classes, reported accompanying his step-father to the mosque, and able to recite the Koran in the original Arabic).

Reuven Koret, Aaron Klein and Daniel Pipes have previously pointed to the attempts by Obama and his campaign to conceal the candidate's Muslim background. The well documented evidence draws upon the on-the-ground interviews by researchers in Indonesia and Kenya, published quotations of Obama's childhood friends and his school records, as well as the candidate's own autobiography.

It is not clear whether Barack Obama will now disown his half-brother Malik for acknowledging that shared family background. In any case, some one should notify "Fight the Smear" tout de suite. Perhaps they can get him with the program.

I find it intersting that not one person in media, news or any faction of information has brought to light the complete thoughts of the "doomsday" couple...The Obamas...

Here is just a few inserts from the race riddled thesis from Mrs. Hussain Obama...

The 1985 thesis provides a trove of Michelle Obama's thoughts as a young woman, with many of the paper's statements describing the student's world as seen through a race-based prism.

"My experiences at Princeton have made me far more aware of my 'blackness' than ever before," the future Mrs. Obama wrote in her thesis introduction. "I have found that at Princeton, no matter how liberal and open-minded some of my white professors and classmates try to be toward me, I sometimes feel like a visitor on campus; as if I really don't belong. Regardless of the circumstances underwhich I interact with whites at Princeton, it often seems as if, to them, I will always be black first and a student second."

Obama writes that the path she chose by attending Princeton would likely lead to her "further integration and/or assimilation into a white cultural and social structure that will only allow me to remain on the periphery of society; never becoming a full participant."

In defining the concept of identification or the ability to identify with the black community," the Princeton student wrote, "I based my definition on the premise that there is a distinctive black culture very different from white culture." Other thesis statements specifically pointed to what was seen by the future Mrs. Obama as racially insensitive practices in a university system populated with mostly Caucasian educators and students: "Predominately white universities like Princeton are socially and academically designed to cater to the needs of the white students comprising the bulk of their enrollments."

Perhaps one of the most germane subjects approached in the thesis is a section in which she conveyed views about political relations between black and white communities. She quotes the work of sociologists James Conyers and Walter Wallace, who discussed "integration of black official(s) into various aspects of politics" and notes "problems which face these black officials who must persuade the white community that they are above issues of race and that they are representing all people and not just black people," as opposed to creating "two separate social structures."

To research her thesis, the future Mrs. Obama sent an 18-question survey to a sampling of 400 black Princeton graduates, requesting the respondents define the amount of time and "comfort" level spent interacting with blacks and whites before they attended the school, as well as during and after their University years. Other questions dealt with their individual religious beliefs, living arrangements, careers, role models, economic status, and thoughts about lower class blacks. In addition, those surveyed were asked to choose whether they were more in line with a "separationist and/or pluralist" viewpoint or an "integrationist and/or assimilationist" ideology.

Just under 90 alums responded to the questionnaires (for a response rate of approximately 22 percent) and the conclusions were not what she expected. "I hoped that these findings would help me conclude that despite the high degree of identification with whites as a result of the educational and occupational path that black Princeton alumni follow, the alumni would still maintain a certain level of identification with the black community. However, these findings do not support this possibility."

Not sure about anyone else...but again..

 

I DO NOT WANT THIS KIND OF PERSN IN THE WHITEHOUSE...

read entire thesis here...

http://www.politico.com/pdf/080222_MOPrincetonThesi
s_1-251.pdf

http://www.politico.com/pdf/080222_MOPrincetonThesi
s_26-501.pdf

http://www.politico.com/pdf/080222_MOPrincetonThesi
s_51-751.pdf

http://dyn.politico.com/pdf/080222_MOPrincetonThesi
s_76-981.pdf

Are you kidding me....are we this touchy and wussified that this offends someone?

 

 

This is a complete joke that this company had to take this harmless toy off the market.

Does this offend anyone?

 

If so...Grow up and grow a backbone!

 

This doesn't even account for the drilling of known oil deposits in Texas, Oklahoma, and Colorado.    Thanks to the environmentalist lobby and its influence on Democratic legislators in Congress, the U.S. has, for decades, been prohibited from drilling for oil in places that we know contain billions of barrels of proven reserves.

***China, Cuba, Canada and others continue to drill off our shores where US companies are not allowed to drill because of Democratic policies!

Yes, that's right  . China and Cuba are actively exploring oil fields 50 miles from Key West, Florida while U.S. companies are barred from working in this area because of U.S. policy . So, instead of allowing the most environmentally responsible companies to operate there and increase our domestic supply, China, who has a dismal environmental record, is preparing to suck our close, lucrative oil reserves dry.   Unbelievable.   Investor's Business Daily recently explained how irresponsible the Democrats have been on the energy crisis. They lay into what they consider to be the worst Congress ever for . ~ Failing to allow drilling in ANWR. We have, as President Bush noted, estimated capacity of a million barrels of oil a day from this source alone -- enough for 27 million gallons of gas and diesel. But Congress won't touch it, fearful of the clout of the environmental lobby. As a result, you pay through the nose at the pump so your representative can raise campaign cash.

~ Refusing to build new refineries. The U.S. hasn't built one since 1976, yet the EPA requires at least 15 unique 'boutique' fuel blends that can be sold in different areas around the nation. This means that U.S. refinery capacity is stretched so tight that even the slightest problem at a refinery causes enormous supply problems and price spikes. Congress has done nothing about this.

~ Turning its back on nuclear power. It's safe and, with advances in nuclear reprocessing technology, waste problems have been minimized. Still, we have just 104 nuclear plants -- the same as a decade ago -- producing just 19% of our total energy. (Many European nations produce 40% or more of their power with nuclear.) Granted, nuclear power plants are expensive -- about $3 billion each. But they produce energy at $1.72/kilowatt-hour vs. $2.37 for coal and $6.35 for natural gas.

~ Raising taxes on energy producers. This is where a basic understanding of economics would help: Higher taxes and needless regulation lead to less production of a commodity. So by proposing 'windfall' and other taxes on energy companies plus tough new rules, Congress only makes our energy situation worse.

These are just a few of Congress' sins of omission -- all while India, China, Eastern Europe and the Middle East are adding more than a million barrels of new demand each and every year. New Energy Department forecasts see world oil demand growing 40% by 2030, including a 28% increase in the U.S.

Americans who are worried about the direction of their country, including runaway energy and food prices, should keep in mind the upcoming election isn't just about choosing a new president. We'll also pick a new Congress.

Big Big Issue…

You’re not going to believe this… but I hope you hear this and I hope you get really pissed off when I tell you.



Keep in mind… we still have a little bit of time here… but it’s only because the House of Representatives unexpectedly delayed the Iraq supplemental spending Bill Thursday, the full Senate won't be allowed to vote on the amnesty bill that the Senate Appropriations Committee unexpectedly took up and approved Thursday and attached to it.



If you didn’t catch that… I’ll spell it out. There is an AMNESTY Bill attached to an IRAQ spending bill. So in order to fund our troops and their safety… Feinstein wants to trade that for Criminal Amnesty.



It now looks like the full Senate won't be allowed to vote on the amnesty for around 1.3 million illegal alien ag workers (plus their families) until next Wednesday.



That gives us some time to beat this atrocity.



This bill is sick and really does about four things.



- Grant a three-year work visa followed by a permanent greencard to all illegal aliens who have been working as shepherds, goat herders and dairy herders.



- Grant a five-year work visa to the estimated 1.3 million illegal aliens working in other agricultural jobs -- plus all of their families. There is no instruction on what happens after the five years.



- Grant a tripling of the maximum number of H-2B visas for lower skill, non-agricultural seasonal workers.



- Grant industries an extra 218,000 additional permanent green cards for skilled foreign workers.



And the worst part about the whole this is that we’ve told Congress about a hundred times that WE DON’T WANT CRIMINAL AMNESTY IN ANY FASHION.



Here’s what it takes to qualify.



You only have to meet ONE of the following three criteria to get the amnesty:

• Earned $7,000 working in agriculture during the 2004-2007 period.



• Or worked 863 hours in agriculture during the 2004-2007 period.



• Or worked at least a little bit in agriculture on 150 different days during the 2004-2007 period.



That amounts to an average of $1,750 per year ...

... or 216 hours per year (the equivalent of 4 hours per week) ...

... or parts of 37 days per year.



Call the offices of both of your state's U.S.

Senators and tell them:

• The Senate Appropriations Committee on Thursday afternoon committed an outrageous act of disrespect for our men and women in uniform and to the citizens of this country by attaching an illegal-alien amnesty to the Iraq spending bill.



• Urge the Senator to vote and work to strip the amnesty from the Iraq spending bill on the floor.



• You - or the Senator - may already oppose this spending bill. But if the Senator is inclined to vote YES on the Iraq bill, ask the Senator to definitely vote NO and send it back to committee if the amnesty is NOT stripped.



• There is no need for an amnesty to provide growers with workers. There already is an H-2A foreign ag worker program that provides growers with an unlimited number of temporary workers if the growers agree to pay a decent wage and ensure that they go home at the end of the season. Feinstein is just trying to protect the abysmally low wages and bad working conditions that farmworkers labor under.



We don’t want AMNESTY… We don’t want the NAU… We shouldn’t be kneeling before a bunch of Criminal Immigrants.



This makes me sick.

Today in New Orleans Bush and the leaders from Mexico and Canada are signing papers to join us all into one big happy family.  There is a huge rally that is being held outside of this travisty...here is a little more about it...

 

President Bush, Mexico's President Calderon and Canadian Prime Minister Harper will be in New Orleans for this year's North American Leaders Summit. On April 21-22 the three so-called leaders will be discussing further implementation of the Security and Prosperity Partnership in the city that Bush turned his back on just a few years ago. This is a high profile event with media that spans the globe.

There are so many things that We The People need to protest. It is clear that changes will not be made until we take a stand. This protest will be like that of Martin Luther King Jr. in the 60's. Like the issues of those days, changes were not made until the American people united in protest. This is that time for us, now. No matter your issue, this is the time to take a stand for what you believe in. If the founders of this nation knew that 200 years down the road the American People would not take a stand to correct the problems that our corrupted, greedy politicians have created they would be ashamed. Don't let them down!

There are many people who will be attending and some are going to have differing viewpoints on certain issues but it vitally important to put aside our differences and keep the peace. In the NOLA link above, I have put up links where you can make hotel reservations, get info on restaurants and nightclubs and a link to download coupons that can be used during your stay in New Orleans. Yes, it is important to spend a little cash into New Orleans' economy and let's have fun while we are there!

We will meet at Jackson Square (801 Chartres, Map to Jackson Square) at 8 am on the 21st and 22nd and will be wearing white armbands. If you're interested make a banner, dress in costume and let's have fun while we demand change! And visit CorrupTees for t-shirts and banners to bring to the protest. Remember, this is a leaderless protest. There is not one person or group that is sponsoring this event, this is about each American taking the initiative to peacably assemble as prescribed by the first amendment.

Now let's see if they turn this around like they did the Trans Texas Corridor rally where they said "all the protesters were against paying tolls."  Um, no we are against a mass terrorist highway going through our backyards, and our government taking our land ...

 

Keep and eye on this people...it is no joke...the NAU is coming wherther you are on board or not...just goole the Amero...our new money that is already being coin in US mints....

Financial Information Being Posted Is Too Personal, Aides Say


Working from a cramped loft apartment a mile from the Capitol, a small Internet company has sparked a privacy rights battle with hundreds of angry top House staffers upset that the Web site has begun posting details about their personal finances.

In an unusual conflict over constitutional rights, the aides argue that the recent disclosures leave them highly vulnerable to identity theft. But the Web site, LegiStorm, contends that it has a First Amendment right to publish already public information about some of the Capitol's most powerful players -- the high-level staffers -- and is creating a new check against potential corruption.

"Congressional staffers are among the most powerful people in Washington, and in the past they have received very little scrutiny. It's about time there was a little more scrutiny given to what they're doing," said Jock Friedly, president and founder of LegiStorm, which has six employees.

For several years, LegiStorm has published salary and expenditure reports that are released regularly by the House and Senate. The reports, released quarterly by the House and semiannually by the Senate, provide detailed information on how much each lawmaker spends, along with the names, titles and salaries of every employee.

In late February, however, LegiStorm expanded the data it provides by putting the staffers' personal financial disclosure forms online. Those documents, which must be filed by senior aides, contain explicit detail on aides' finances -- including bank accounts and investment portfolios -- as well as some home addresses and signatures.

The posts have enraged top House staffers whose personal finances are now on display for any Internet sleuth to access with a few clicks of a computer mouse. The move has not, however, generated many complaints from Senate aides.

"Who knew it was going to get posted on the Web? It's shocking," said one House Democratic chief of staff, who requested anonymity to discuss her personal finances. "Now that anybody can look it up on the Web, I don't know if I like it anymore."

Her forms for 2006, which were filed last spring, included her home address and 32 pages of detailed statements about bank accounts under the name of her husband and daughter. That prompted her to raise concerns about identity theft at a chiefs of staff meeting in March.

At other similar meetings over the last month, some aides have suggested that the House general counsel should sue LegiStorm, which they accused of trying to profit from the dissemination of their records. Friedly said he is not selling the information on his Web site, which is available free but is supported by advertising.

He also noted that a number of media sites, including washingtonpost. com and Congressional Quarterly, publish similar data for members of Congress.

"Presumably," he predicted, "cooler heads will prevail."

Under federal law, staffers who earn more than $110,000 a year must file financial disclosure forms. In addition to staffers' financial holdings, the documents show any outside income, gifts received and official positions held with outside groups.

Before LegiStorm existed, anyone searching for salary and financial disclosure information had to trek down to the basement of the Cannon House Office Building to rummage through the records. Those searching for financial disclosure forms, either for a lawmaker or a staffer, had to enter their name into a computer database, leaving a record of whose documents they were examining.

The clerk of the House, Lorraine C. Miller, wrote to the more than 2,000 staff members who file disclosure reports, warning them to check whether they reveal any sensitive material, such as bank account or Social Security numbers. That prompted Friedly to uncover more than 20 instances in which such private information was revealed on his Web site, for which he has apologized. The information since has been redacted from the site.

However, Friedly refuses to remove staff home addresses or signatures unless the House pays the roughly $10,000 cost of altering thousands of the forms.

Friedly noted that since his site began publishing the financial information of top aides, the Capitol Hill newspapers Roll Call and the Hill have published articles about questionable transactions by a trio of top staffers, and that the newspapers used LegiStorm to confirm information about the aides.

The financial data is from top aides who are "actually writing the law of the land," he said.

Lawyers from the offices of the House Clerk, House General Counsel and ethics committee are trying to craft new forms that will help resolve the issue. "The office of the Clerk is working to ensure that disclosure requirements are met while at the same time protecting confidential or personal information," said Adam Holmes, spokesman for the clerk.


By Paul Kane
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, April 9, 2008; A17

I just wanted to know what all you great people's thoughts were on the New World Order...or more modestly called the NAU (North American Union).  I know some are trying to downplay this entire merger, but it is real and it is going to happen right under all our noses. 

Bush announced during the state of the union that he, the Prime Minister of Canada, and the President of Mexico will visit New Orleans in April for the fourth annual North American Leader’s Summit.  Picking New Orleans for the summit location is kinda ironic, being as they will no longer need the ports there which was made pretty clear after Katrina.  Ca and LA ports will be abandoned and everything will go through Mexican ports.  This will also help push the Texas Trans Corridor down our throats.  Bush and the "hat of America's" leader as well as the under belly of America's leader are basically having New orleans residents celebrate their own demise by saying this summit will bring business to the area....HA!

This all takes place in NO on 4/21-22/2008

It is truely sad to see our "leaders" give our country away piece by piece.

Any ideas or thoguhts on the direction we are headin?

Not sure how many of you listen to "The Savage Nation" with Michael Savage, but he is now in a battle that concerns us all!  He is filing suit against the Islamic group C.A.I.R. 

CAIR, a powerful and well-funded lobby group, has been targeting Savage's radio advertisers with a campaign of lies and intimidation. Every single advertiser has been pressured, and a few have caved in to the heavy-handed threats.

CAIR is a spin-off of the Richardson, Texas-based Islamic Association For Palestine, or IAP, which was founded by Marzook. Former FBI counterterrorism chief Oliver Revell has called the IAF "a front organization for Hamas that engages in propaganda for Islamic militants."

Marzook, deputy chief of Hamas' political bureau in Syria, founded the IAP in 1991. At its conferences in the United States, the IAP hosted leaders of Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood. Marzook was deported in 1997.

It was not the first conviction for Elashi. As chairman of the Holy Land Foundation charity in Dallas, Elashi was convicted last year of making illegal technology shipments to two countries on the U.S. list of terrorist-sponsoring states, Libya and Syria. Four brothers, including Bayan and Basman, also were convicted.

Other CAIR figures convicted since 9/11 are Randall Todd "Ismail" Royer, a former communications specialist and civil-rights coordinator, and Bassem Khafagi, former director of community relations.

Royer was sentenced to 20 years in prison on charges he trained in Virginia for holy war against the United States and sent several members to Pakistan to join Lashkar-e-Taiba, a Kashmiri terrorist group with reported ties to al-Qaida.

In a plea bargain, Royer claimed he never intended to hurt anyone, but admitted he organized the holy warriors after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States.

After his arrest, Royer sought legal counsel from Hamas lawyer Stanley Cohen, who said after 9/11 he would consider serving as a defense lawyer for Osama bin Laden if the al-Qaida leader were captured.

Khafagi, was arrested in January 2003, while serving with CAIR, and convicted on fraud and terrorism charges.

Current CAIR leaders also have made statements in support of Hamas and the domination of the United States by Islam.

As WorldNetDaily reported, CAIR's chairman of the board, Omar Ahmad, was cited by a California newspaper in 1998 declaring the Quran should be America's highest authority. He also was reported to have said Islam is not in America to be equal to any other religion, but to be dominant.

Ask yourselves if this group has the moral authority to be determining who broadcasts on American radio.

It's time to choose sides in this fight.

Do you support the right of one of America's most popular radio talk-show hosts to air his unadulterated views?

Or do you support the brown-shirt tactics of those who want to Islamicize the United States of America?

 

Check out the law suit for yourself...Click Here!